break off with general in front combat

[PUNCH]

a situation we had last Week:

a norman general fighting in combat with his TUG of Knights against a TUG of éléphants wanted to break off , so plays a card to do F3 on the manœuvre table.

must having a KAB for his " formed" mounted.


this snivelling little coward  did not want to have a KAB because he leaves the combat pretending that a Breaking off is not leaving a combat ( booohhh!).

but he must have a KAB !! the rules chapter 9.8 B 2.2.3.5 page 97 "if an opposing general plays a card to leave combat then you get a KAB test on the UG (whether staying with the UG or not)."

Am I right Simon?

All the best.

PUNCH " the elephant "

[nikgaukroger]

Already answered - https://mortem-et-gloriam.co.uk/smf/index.php?topic=336.0

[Rino]

Eheh too late!!

And you can't brand knight charging éléphants as being coward!!

Rino - the Knight

[Simon Meg-Meister]

Played a card to "break off" not to "leave the combat [still onoing]"