Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Gavin

#1
List Queries / Re: Achean Achilles sub command
April 28, 2023, 06:19:43 PM
Quote from: badhabum on April 23, 2023, 07:44:40 PM
Quote from: Gavin on April 23, 2023, 12:11:52 PM
Quote from: nikgaukroger on February 09, 2023, 06:58:50 PM
An internal allied contingent has the following requirement (amongst others) "Each internal ally must be a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 UGs."

The list note of "Achilles does not have to include otherwise compulsory troops in his contingent if he commands Myrmidons." refers to troops that would normally be compulsory and not to the contingent size.

Wording is fine IMO unless one is approaching it to wilfully misread it and try to avoid the requirements.

Of course, if I am wrong about the contingent requirements then I'll agree the wording needs changing  ;D

I feel I must point out that, if you are considering the wording from a technical writing of requirements or standards point of view (which is how MeG as a set of "rules" is written): then "each ally MUST have..." is a compulsory requirement and it is about UGs who are clearly troops.  Thus "does not have to include otherwise compulsory troops" means Achilles with Myrmidons and 0-3 other UGs is clearly what is meant.

I will also point out that my first ever game of MeG against an opponent was against Simon (rules author) and he kindly put together a list for me - Acheaean Greek (as I have a 28mm DBM army) - and it had Achillles in command of just the Myrmidons.  Now it is, of course, possible that Simon was not concerned with minor list details and more concerned with helping a new player understand the game... (and rules authors have been known to mis-remember their rules as they have so many versions in their heads).

I have since worked out my own list...and obviously I have assumed Achilles with Myrmidons must have 0-3 other UGs.

Hy I fear you mix two requirements or requirement 1 and requirement 2. Achilles has to submit to 1 and 3, but skip 2 . I hope I am being clear ( it's at the beginning of each army list book ):

Where allies are allowed, they must conform to the following rules:
1. An ally must be a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 UGs.
2. They must take enough UGs to get them to at least 50% of the minimums in the list being used.
3. They can thereafter take any troops up to the maximum to create the rest of the allied contingent.

Agree there are 3 clear requirements at beginning of each army list book.  And a clear statement that Achilles is exempt from commanding compulsory troops  if he command Myrmidons.

Thus, if commanding Myrmidons, he is exempt from first part of  req 1 (I.e. from minimum) but not from second part (i.e. the maximum). And agree exempt from req 2.
#2
List Queries / Re: Achean Achilles sub command
April 23, 2023, 12:11:52 PM
Quote from: nikgaukroger on February 09, 2023, 06:58:50 PM
An internal allied contingent has the following requirement (amongst others) "Each internal ally must be a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 UGs."

The list note of "Achilles does not have to include otherwise compulsory troops in his contingent if he commands Myrmidons." refers to troops that would normally be compulsory and not to the contingent size.

Wording is fine IMO unless one is approaching it to wilfully misread it and try to avoid the requirements.

Of course, if I am wrong about the contingent requirements then I'll agree the wording needs changing  ;D

I feel I must point out that, if you are considering the wording from a technical writing of requirements or standards point of view (which is how MeG as a set of "rules" is written): then "each ally MUST have..." is a compulsory requirement and it is about UGs who are clearly troops.  Thus "does not have to include otherwise compulsory troops" means Achilles with Myrmidons and 0-3 other UGs is clearly what is meant.

I will also point out that my first ever game of MeG against an opponent was against Simon (rules author) and he kindly put together a list for me - Acheaean Greek (as I have a 28mm DBM army) - and it had Achillles in command of just the Myrmidons.  Now it is, of course, possible that Simon was not concerned with minor list details and more concerned with helping a new player understand the game... (and rules authors have been known to mis-remember their rules as they have so many versions in their heads).

I have since worked out my own list...and obviously I have assumed Achilles with Myrmidons must have 0-3 other UGs.
#3
Quote from: lionheartrjc on April 22, 2023, 07:00:00 PM
Quote from: Gavin on April 22, 2023, 04:23:25 PM
Slightly different query.

Why is the upgrade to Velites after 209BC optional?

Is this to allow for interpretation that Velites were not that special...so just like other javelin armed skirmishers?

Yes.
Thanks
#4
Slightly different query.

Why is the upgrade to Velites after 209BC optional?

Is this to allow for interpretation that Velites were not that special...so just like other javelin armed skirmishers?
#5
Quote from: nikgaukroger on April 06, 2023, 06:53:35 AM
The clarifications and errata document includes the following:

Quote
DEPLOYMENT ZONES Page 69. Paragraphs 1. 2. & 3. Should say "Unless on a flank march or ambush, UGs are deployed >=6BW from the table centre line and only SUGs or flexible mounted TUGs in skirmish formation may deploy within 5BW of a table side edge without a secure flank from the PBS map.


Thanks - found it eventually.
#6
Quote from: nikgaukroger on April 06, 2023, 06:50:58 AM
The detailed rules on Pavise appear on page 207  as part of the appendix on characteristics

Thanks - had not spotted. Probably as I keep starting from the front...and then getting so far before my brain gets full 😉
#7
Thanks Lawrence...appears as I suspected there is a typo in the Compendium.  I don't have the pdf...just original rules and Compendium  :)
#8
Compendium pg 69, bullet 2 says: Other UGs must be deployed in the centre sector or be on a flank march.

This appears to be a change from original rules as checking back it does not appear in them.  Original rules appear to have a 5 BW outer zone for deployment (and makes no reference to centre sector).  {I only skimmed my original copy so could have misread it}

Page 61 and figure on page 67 both agree the centre sector is outside the 10 BW flank sectors.

Thus TuGs (not in ambush, or flexible mounted, or on an edge with a secure flank) must be at least 10 BW from flank.

Bullet 1 says only ....... may be in outer 5 BW.

So does this mean nothing can be between 5 BW and 10 BW?!? - my reading of game reports does not suggest this.

But I can not see how Rules as Written can be interpreted any other way.

I checked errata/clarifications document but didn't spot anything.  Help please (a confused new player).
#9
Guessing the Compendium pg 51 has a mis-print in the Pavise description as says.  "Cover and +s in charge combat".  From looking elsewhere I get impression this should be +1 rather than +s.

I looked at errata but could not see this one (but I might have missed it).
#10
Events / Re: 2022-02-26/27 - 26th BADCON
August 06, 2021, 06:01:39 PM
Is this 15mm?  (Hoping it might be 25mm)
#11
I assume this is 15mm (though I can hope it is 25mm) as not been able to spot a figure size on any of the various pages I have visited.