Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Jilu

#1
List Queries / Re: 6114 Inca
February 06, 2026, 03:55:15 PM
well could it not be corrected?
#2
List Queries / Re: 6114 Inca
February 05, 2026, 04:21:11 AM
Quote from: Jilu on January 28, 2026, 02:45:32 PMHello,

The list of Subject tribes states that :
Subject tribesmen may be incorporated into an Incan command or be placed in a separate internal allied contingent of a specific tribe (Chincha, Collas, Cunti, Chimu or Canari).  If
used only in an allied contingent, the maxima number of bases is doubled.

The Canari have no option to upgrade, is there a specific reason?

there is no option to upgrade to spear
#3
List Queries / 6114 Inca
January 28, 2026, 02:45:32 PM
Hello,

The list of Subject tribes states that :
Subject tribesmen may be incorporated into an Incan command or be placed in a separate internal allied contingent of a specific tribe (Chincha, Collas, Cunti, Chimu or Canari).  If
used only in an allied contingent, the maxima number of bases is doubled.

The Canari have no option to upgrade, is there a specific reason?
#4
List Queries / Pueblo Culture 6304
January 18, 2026, 05:00:01 PM
Warriors can be tribal loose , unprotected, average, short spear and upgraded to melee expert 12-36


Up to half can be upgraded to

Tibal loose,unprotected,  average, short spear, melee expert

I fail to see the upgrade
#5
If it is a flank charge for the chargers what about the charge combat claims for the defender if the bases are turned to face the enemy. do these count ?
#6
List Queries / Re: 2704 Early Carthaginian
November 13, 2025, 04:25:28 PM
syracuse 2706

 Truceless War Mercenary : Helenes 2711
#7
List Queries / Re: 2704 Early Carthaginian
November 12, 2025, 02:19:53 PM
Quote from: lionheartrjc on November 10, 2025, 08:15:19 AM
Quote from: Jilu on November 10, 2025, 01:34:52 AMalso, hoplites are longspear?

Oops, they shouldn't be....

Richard
there are other lists with longspear hoplites in the book Spain, Sicily and Africa
#8
List Queries / Re: 2704 Early Carthaginian
November 10, 2025, 01:34:52 AM
also, hoplites are longspear?
#10
List Queries / 2704 Early Carthaginian
November 03, 2025, 03:31:28 PM
 Gallic foot (from 350 to 276
BCE)
tug sizes  6,8,9

but only 8 bases allowed
#11
Player Discussion / Re: Problem with 2026 Army Builder
October 26, 2025, 04:55:37 PM
Hello it seems that for my libreoffice i cannot ad a fortified camp
#12
Quote from: nikgaukroger on October 20, 2025, 09:29:53 AM
Quote from: lionheartrjc on October 14, 2025, 04:53:10 PMThere is designing an army, but ultimately there is using the army you have designed effectively.  I think a lot of people don't really understand the second bit. They think with the perfect design they will win, but it doesn't work that way.  A good player with a poor army usually beats a poor player with a good army.

This is spot on. I'd add that for most players we also have styles of armies that suit us better than others and that we will generally do better with those which reinforces that just copying a successful list is no guarantee of better performance.

And then were the dice of doom...
#13
Hello, after this weekends tournament in Ruiel i had a nice game with Nik and talked about two things with him that occured in our game :
- reducing black dice to slow only dice : slows the game down and makes shooting less effective. Black dice are already bad in themselves.
  It would be easier to keep black, simply back a wound is a wound. When tyou figure out the nice to trow you just stop the thinking ...black          is simply black.
- Pushing ennemy sugs : as it stands now the rule has good intentions but is neither easy to understand nor to follow. finding a better way to do this would be nice, maybe we could (my ideas) : 

--  make an unprompted fallback but keeps at 1 MU from ennemy TUG.
-- skirmishing move with VMd
-- flee move with VMD

#14
To speed up play and make shooting more effective :
- A  S on a dice slows down the UG by 1MU whatever the front size
- If black dice they can never go lower than the black dice :  no 'only slowing effect"

It is simpler to play and speeds things up too, also less mistakes possible.




 
#15
Quote from: Wizard of Oz on October 09, 2025, 02:37:06 AMIn my view it's an absolute no-brainer! Yes, yes, yes.
It is not complicated.
There should not be an artificial separation between skirmish and non-skirmish shooters. And why for non-skirmish infantry? The least likely of any to get around a flank.
As for doesn't come up much! Of course it doesn't at this time because it is pointless. There is no benefit now, so why go to the effort to place shooters there? But if it might be rewarded? That's a different matter. Still not easy, but worth the attempt, especially with skirmish light horse.
Again, if I had a vote, it would be Yes!
 

agree