Quote from: lionheartrjc on April 17, 2026, 04:20:41 PMI think you misunderstand.   The ally general must be the type of the Army Commander of the ally list from which the contingent is drawn.

So if you have a Gallic ally, the ally general must be Instinctive.  If you have an Imperial Roman ally, the ally general must be Professional.

Richard

Hi Richard,

I misunderstand nothing, just a question that arose with a new player.

It's written from the main list,  not the ally list 

Regards.

Gilles

Hi,

if the Army commander is mediocre, may I have an ally competent or talented if there is nothing specified in the notes ?
never spotted that the ally must be of the type of the Army commander page 33 2.D 4.4 since 2016!!

thanks for your answer.

Regards

Gilles

Quote from: badhabum on March 02, 2026, 10:57:58 AMSalut Gilles

Play the rules OK so do not moan on the rules 

See you at Chanier but I will not be able to bring "américain" sorry

Always moaning about everyone and everything, I'm french !;-)
See you there to moan (or not 😀 ).

Found a way to make fake "américain ", fake but satisfying ones 😉

All the best.

Gilles

Quote from: badhabum on January 02, 2026, 08:33:27 PMThat's what I suggest : they did not evade . In battle they fought

Hi Jacques,

any proof? photos? reels? were you there?

play the rules and lists as they are

don't forget that 's a game of toy soldiers nothing else 

be seeing you

PUNCH ou Gilles " on ne sait plus 

Quote from: lionheartrjc on February 27, 2026, 06:14:34 PM

Quote from: PUNCH on February 27, 2026, 04:46:49 PM

Quote from: lionheartrjc on February 27, 2026, 11:35:43 AMThe QRS can be downloaded from https://mortem-et-gloriam.co.uk/meg/2026-competition-amendments/.

Which version of the beta test are we playing now ?

The rules have not been changed.  Competitions can use the 2026 competition amendments, which are on the website as listed above. Quite bluntly, I cannot see what is confusing.

Moaning is our french national sport 😀
Rules have not changed ok, but in the IWC competition last we dignité play like in 2025, even if I' ok with the changes, next compétition in Chaniers we will surely play with 2026 amendements tweaks, waiting which month update will be used (just kidding).
Last friday we played a game (january update), next friday ( with february update), my bowmen won't have the same capabilites, so rules have changed 😉
And me still moaning ( no change in 2026 😀).

Regards.

Gilles

Quote from: lionheartrjc on February 27, 2026, 06:16:27 PM

Quote from: PUNCH on February 27, 2026, 04:26:44 PM

Quote from: lionheartrjc on February 27, 2026, 03:54:58 PM

Quote from: badhabum on February 27, 2026, 03:52:02 PMAs a up for the rules new version . I still think it is a good idea

So do I. It is in the list of changes for consideration.

Hi,
This dice upgrade should count only on the right side and the rear of the target,  the left side of target have their shield to protect them,except units of left hand men perhaps ??

Unnecessarily complicated.  The shield does not really protect the left side much more than the right side.  It is the fact that you are not being shot from the front that would be the issue.

Hi,

My point was only a wrg 7th humour, missed Gilles, try again:-)
Of course useless in meg

Quote from: lionheartrjc on February 27, 2026, 11:35:43 AMThe QRS can be downloaded from https://mortem-et-gloriam.co.uk/meg/2026-competition-amendments/.

Hi,

Wich version of the beta test are we playing now ?

It's at the best confusion.

I don't understand where we are going, so It's time to stop wandering with no cap.

Just the feeling to be tired, too many updates in very short time.

There was new beta test versions each year, now every two month, will get back to competition when the final version will be send for free to all players involved since the spartan days.

Be seeing you.

N°8

Quote from: lionheartrjc on February 27, 2026, 03:54:58 PM

Quote from: badhabum on February 27, 2026, 03:52:02 PMAs a up for the rules new version . I still think it is a good idea

So do I. It is in the list of changes for consideration.

Hi,
This dice upgrade should count only on the right side and the rear of the target,  the left side of target have their shield to protect them,except units of left hand men perhaps ??

Regards.

PUNCH

Salut à tous,

je serai là, " à fond le FLUFF!"

Punch "génie sans bouillir de MEG!  "

moi!
présent!

+1

Quote from: Onurbm on March 20, 2025, 01:33:41 PMBonsoir
Une petite suggestion pour accélérer la mise en orde des inscriptions et listes .
Dans les tournois DBA ou j'ai mon mot à dire, nous utilisons l'astuce suivante .
Au premiers tours ce sont les joueurs eux mêmes qui choisissent leur adversaire . L'ordre des choix est défini par la date à laquelle l'inscription est complète . Pour BORNEL ce serait liste valide et droits d'inscription réglée.
Si une liste est modifiée, la date est celle de dernière modification de la liste .

Rien de miraculeux , ça n'a pas d'impact sur le classement final du tournoi mais ça simplifie quelques peu la vie des organisateurs en motivant quelque peu les tournoyeurs .
Si tu adoptées la méthode , Ça nécessite d'être publié, T3 et Forum .

Perso je jouerais Eastern Han allie southern Hiung nu ... liste disponible quand tu le souhaites et finances de même. 🙉🙈🙊

Salut à tous,

c'est moi qui gère pour les vérifs des listes;-)
c'est moi qui serai le hasard des appareillements :-)
j'ai déjà mis de côté ma chaise pour l'arbitrage :-)

a+

Punch " Arbitre international auto proclamé! ;-)"

Ps: Listes à envoyer sur mon adresse GMAIL siouplait!

Quote from: nikgaukroger on March 27, 2025, 11:19:00 AM
You know I'd never even clocked the 5.2 bit 

The answer will be the base that covers most of the frontage as when shooting at chargers is done there has been no movement of the chargers yet and there is no requirement to move chargers in the order declared (or similar) so you cannot determine which first comes within 1 BW.

Hi Nik and Philippe,

in the case above if we are using your explainations then we should use one charger as a screen for the other one.
the shooting at charger is supposed to be at one BW , even if you can't reach them due to slowing effect  or dying before moving them :-(
and you can shoot at the charger if the target can skirmish or run away all along the path of charge.like you were in one BW.

the priority on targets in the shooting phase is different from the shooting at chargers in my understanding ( I may be wrong;-) )

All the best.

Gilles

Quote from: badhabum on January 29, 2025, 05:09:44 PM
In ( as you know )

+1

Quote from: nikgaukroger on July 16, 2024, 03:06:32 PM

Quote from: lionheartrjc on July 16, 2024, 02:21:15 PM
This clarification is not valid.

Richard

Pre-Compendium I believe and not in the Compendium clarries. Tempus fugit.

Hi,

I thought we play "post compendium" and LULU Book 7.3 page 47 of the rules seems to be clear to read.

Kind regards.

Gilles "this message will selfdestroy after reading ;-)"