Great, thanks!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#2
MeG Australia / Any players in Melbourne?
December 02, 2025, 01:28:23 PM
Hi there,
Are there any people in Melbourne who play MeG on a regular basis?
There might be a move to Australia in my future...
Cheers
Huub (currently in Belgium)
Are there any people in Melbourne who play MeG on a regular basis?
There might be a move to Australia in my future...
Cheers
Huub (currently in Belgium)
#3
Player Discussion / Re: for later use I know but terrain effect simplification
October 11, 2025, 04:43:39 PM
Yeah, why not? It's easier to remember anyway and none of us are getting any younger... 
#4
Player Discussion / Re: Belgian proposal sixth army characteristics
October 08, 2025, 09:38:22 AM
Well, valid point. I've alway wondered why just one UG in a horse archer army could have feigned flight. Seemed odd to me.
#5
Player Discussion / Re: Belgian proposal three Close infantry limited deployment zone
October 08, 2025, 09:36:23 AM
It would help to to stop people from diging in and turning a battle into a siege.
#6
Player Discussion / Re: Belgian proposal two shooting ( 3 proposals in one )
October 08, 2025, 09:34:44 AM
Let's test this. Could be quicker.
#7
Player Discussion / Re: Belgian proposal one simplifying melee when already in contact
October 08, 2025, 09:33:05 AM
Again, good for speeding up play
#8
Player Discussion / Re: Belgian proposal seven the river
October 08, 2025, 09:31:37 AMQuote from: badhabum on October 07, 2025, 08:28:10 PMAbsolutely not REG experience
Indeed. Or maybe we could add an incentive for controlling the river?
#9
Player Discussion / Re: Belgian proposal four flank/rear charges
October 08, 2025, 09:30:02 AMQuote from: badhabum on October 05, 2025, 07:33:27 PMInflict an automatic wound for any flank/rear charge ( per charge ) to reflect surprise, reorganisation . The aim is to speed up the game and be a good reason to protect your flanks
I've seen this work really well in ReG, and I'mm in favor of it!
#10
Player Discussion / Re: 2026 Proposed Amendment #3.2 - Fall back for other troops
October 06, 2025, 03:36:59 PM
Harsh, painfully realistic. I'd love to try it!
#11
Events / Re: 2025-10 18/19 Rueil France 2025 EMeGC
May 18, 2025, 06:31:44 PM
Je ne serai pas là.
#12
Events / Re: 2025-05-17 et 18 - BORNEL
May 13, 2025, 01:06:28 PM
A ce stade, est-il clair qui sont les concurrents, quelle armée ils amènent et peut-être aussi qui joue contre qui au premier tour ?
#13
Player Discussion / Re: More historic rule for scythed chariots?
March 11, 2025, 02:29:48 PM
All in all an interesting idea that I'd like to test with my Galatians at some point!
#15
List Queries / 5715 - Medieval Polish with allies
February 10, 2025, 09:27:46 AM
Hi,
List 5715 has me confused where it comes to allies:
'Lithuanian allies - Later Lithuanian (from 1386 CE) - Lithuanian allies are commanded by a sub-general not an ally general. They cannot be hesitant or unreliable.'
1) Does that mean I can pick troops from the Later Lithuanian list 5714 (of course in line with the normal ally rules), with the rule for internal allies of having to take quota from the mandatory stuff from 5715 NOT being applicable?
2) Do the already available numbers of Lithuanians in the 5715 list in any way influence my choice of the numbers from the Lithuanian external ally who is not an ally but a sub?
3) Do I read this correctly, I can then still take another ally who actually counts as one, for example Hungarians?
It all looks very interesting, but also a bit confusing.
Please help?
Cheers
Huub
List 5715 has me confused where it comes to allies:
'Lithuanian allies - Later Lithuanian (from 1386 CE) - Lithuanian allies are commanded by a sub-general not an ally general. They cannot be hesitant or unreliable.'
1) Does that mean I can pick troops from the Later Lithuanian list 5714 (of course in line with the normal ally rules), with the rule for internal allies of having to take quota from the mandatory stuff from 5715 NOT being applicable?
2) Do the already available numbers of Lithuanians in the 5715 list in any way influence my choice of the numbers from the Lithuanian external ally who is not an ally but a sub?
3) Do I read this correctly, I can then still take another ally who actually counts as one, for example Hungarians?
It all looks very interesting, but also a bit confusing.
Please help?
Cheers
Huub