Hi there,
Just quick query (not sure if this has been asked before but I couldn't see anything obvious in the forum): with the new armoured definitions, how do these interact with Integral Shooters? When does Integral Shooters give a claim in charge combat?
1) ArmHrs/Prot: unsure on this one, as the men are only Prot, but ArmHrs does give protection from shooting normally i.e. shooters tend to target the horses to stop the chargers.
2) -/FArm: the -/ does mean they are shot as as protected normally, so I suspect the claim is ok here, for the same reason as above.
3) ArmHrs/FArm: pretty sure this is a definite "No claim!"
Thanks!
Phil
Just quick query (not sure if this has been asked before but I couldn't see anything obvious in the forum): with the new armoured definitions, how do these interact with Integral Shooters? When does Integral Shooters give a claim in charge combat?
1) ArmHrs/Prot: unsure on this one, as the men are only Prot, but ArmHrs does give protection from shooting normally i.e. shooters tend to target the horses to stop the chargers.
2) -/FArm: the -/ does mean they are shot as as protected normally, so I suspect the claim is ok here, for the same reason as above.
3) ArmHrs/FArm: pretty sure this is a definite "No claim!"
Thanks!
Phil
