Integral Archers with new definitions of Armd Horse

[philniv]

Hi there,

Just quick query (not sure if this has been asked before but I couldn't see anything obvious in the forum): with the new armoured definitions, how do these interact with Integral Shooters? When does Integral Shooters give a claim in charge combat?

1) ArmHrs/Prot: unsure on this one, as the men are only Prot, but ArmHrs does give protection from shooting normally i.e. shooters tend to target the horses to stop the chargers.
2) -/FArm: the -/ does mean they are shot as as protected normally, so I suspect the claim is ok here, for the same reason as above.
3) ArmHrs/FArm: pretty sure this is a definite "No claim!"

Thanks!

Phil

[nikgaukroger]

Its in the definition of Integral Shooters in the Characteristics document.

2. Integral Shooters gives +2/+1 when standing to receive a charge from ahead of their front line against Unprotected/Protected chargers respectively, and +1 vs. -­‐/FArm cavalry and camelry.
3. There is no benefit vs. targets who are FArm, ArmHrs/Prot or ArmHrs/FArm.