Main Menu

2026 Proposed Amendments #5.1 Loose/Close Infantry Bw, PBw, XBw

Started by lionheartrjc, August 31, 2025, 08:38:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

nikgaukroger

#31
September 24, 2025, 06:28:32 PM
Easily done, I missed one earlier today  :P
"The Roman Empire was not murdered and nor did it die a natural death; it accidentally committed suicide."

Doomsmile

#32
September 25, 2025, 01:11:16 AM
Something just occurred to me: will Battle Wagons be allowed to benefit from this rules change as well?
(It's always struck me as weird in the past that they don't count as a subset of foot for shooting purposes.)

lionheartrjc

#33
September 25, 2025, 07:11:18 AM
Quote from: Doomsmile on September 25, 2025, 01:11:16 AMSomething just occurred to me: will Battle Wagons be allowed to benefit from this rules change as well?
(It's always struck me as weird in the past that they don't count as a subset of foot for shooting purposes.)
No.  They are not close/loose infantry.

badhabum

#34
November 04, 2025, 11:06:56 AM
We already tested it . Some 4 knights TUGs will be more carrefull as they easily loose a base and being 3 that makes them fragile

Kokor Hekkus

#35
November 04, 2025, 03:43:22 PM
Plus 2 slows, 4's more vulnerable, might change the dynamics on the Continent, as you seen to prefere TuGs of 4 cavalry

badhabum

#36
November 04, 2025, 04:20:05 PM
Quote from: Kokor Hekkus on November 04, 2025, 03:43:22 PMPlus 2 slows, 4's more vulnerable, might change the dynamics on the Continent, as you seen to prefere TuGs of 4 cavalry

Well it depends on what army we play . My tibetans were by 6, all the graeco-Bactrian cavalry I met at Rueil was by 6 . Fred Dufour likes them by 4 . I am  flexible about it
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions