2020-01-18:Brussels 2020

Started by badhabum, April 11, 2019, 07:52:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Robin

Strange decision!! Why are you adding armies out of the time frame ? Thought the cut off date was 115BC.Ancient Brits is 60BC !!! Has something changed. Has it increased to any classical list ?

PUNCH

Quote from: Robin on December 22, 2019, 07:56:04 PM
Strange decision!! Why are you adding armies out of the time frame ? Thought the cut off date was 115BC.Ancient Brits is 60BC !!! Has something changed. Has it increased to any classical list ?

+1, why adding the two lists above and not adding the PONTIC list in this case??

PUNCH

Robin

Late Ptolemaic would be good. Incidentally the published dates for this list is wrong

badhabum

Because Gallic, Germans and britons + scots Irish are really so similar . I was already toying with the idea to add therm to the possible armies but never found time to write it  . In 115 BCE, britons and Scots-irish did already exist but for a reason or another they do not appear in our history books . I am convinced that their fighting style has not been modified by external causes .In 120 BCE they fought as in 70 BCE...

Late Ptolemaic is pretty different. They are an evolution of the Ptolemaic . So they exist in 115 BCE under another form called simply Ptolemaic .

Why not PONTIC : the list is the army of Mithridates VI as he build it to confront Rome and so is IMO a special case . His wars with Rome begin around 100 BCE.

So you have my reasons . No I was not bribed, nor promised anything.

So those 2 armies are out of frame, yes but compare Gallic and British they are near the same .

I just wanted to allow more barbarian armies are so few of them are played and they do feel "in the theme" to me . Does that really bother you ?


sultanbev

Quote from: Simon Meg-Meister on December 22, 2019, 12:53:57 PM
Having had a ponder I thought I would try a loose order foot army and see if the new PBS does what I am hoping to give them a chance.  An old favourite.  ANCIENT BRITONS.


Screenshot 2019-12-21 at 19.23.30 by Simon Hall, on Flickr

Simon, on the screenshot, it shows "Total number of UGs" = 5
but the "Normal deployment batch (1/3 UGs)" = 15
Sholdn't they be the other way round?

lionheartrjc

Quote from: sultanbev on December 23, 2019, 03:34:54 PM
Simon, on the screenshot, it shows "Total number of UGs" = 5
but the "Normal deployment batch (1/3 UGs)" = 15
Sholdn't they be the other way round?

This is the draft army builder for 2020.  The bug has been spotted and corrected.

badhabum

But OK as the people does not wish post 115 BCE barbarians, no Britons, no scotch Irish

steads

Quote from: badhabum on December 24, 2019, 09:34:47 AM
But OK as the people does not wish post 115 BCE barbarians, no Britons, no scotch Irish

It is your tournament. Please do as you wish.

Simon Meg-Meister

No changes for me.
I'll get it right eventually!

S
Rolling Skulls in the land or Purple

badhabum

Nearly new year's eve ...

Speaking definitive lists I received :

0 french list
1 Belgian list ( mine à
2 UK lists
4 greek lists


Cheers

Robin


PUNCH

Quote from: Robin on December 29, 2019, 07:58:55 PM
List deadline is ?

Perhaps the parution of the last Army Builder version ?? ;D

PUNCH

 

rayfredjohn


badhabum

the sooner I have the lists, the sooner you know what  ;D

Simon Meg-Meister

Mines in.
Highland Gallic.
I like a challenge to see if the new PBS tweaks can allow a loose order barbarian army a chance.

S
Rolling Skulls in the land or Purple