Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Yet another bolt shooter question  (Read 1595 times)

Glactophagos

  • Legionary
  • *
  • Posts: 114
    • View Profile
Yet another bolt shooter question
« on: September 26, 2022, 03:55:13 PM »
Hi,

I'm looking at a design for an Imperial Roman army that has TUGs of 5 bases legionaries re-equipped with darts + a 6th base with a bolt shooter, marked as light artillery.
Has the fact that there is a bolt shooter in one of the files any bearing on the shooting properties of the darts in that same file (colour down? no shooting at all?), or not at all?

Please advise?
Huub
Let's fight on the table, not on the forum.

nikgaukroger

  • TWZ Team
  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 3993
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2022, 06:01:24 PM »
I believe the file containing the base with Light Artillery shooting would be able to shoot either with the Art or with the Darts but not both as a file only shoots once.
"The Roman Empire was not murdered and nor did it die a natural death; it accidentally committed suicide."

steads

  • Legionary
  • *
  • Posts: 179
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2022, 01:41:05 AM »
You could always go 4 wide and have 2 files firing as 2 ranks of darts,  1 file firing as Light Artillery and 1 file firing as a single rank of darts.
Not sure it is a good idea but......

lionheartrjc

  • TWZ Team
  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 2332
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2022, 03:50:40 PM »
Page 158, F.1 allows a file to shoot only once.  You can shoot either the darts or the bolt shooter but not both.

Other points to note:  The base itself cannot have both darts and light artillery.   The bolt shooter could be in a third rank and shoot over the two ranks in front of it. 

I must admit I really envisaged the bolt shooter being used with impact weapon legionaries.  Artillery on the battlefield seems to have declined in the third century and I am not aware of any evidence for its use in the 4th century, although I am not aware of any evidence to suggest it wasn't used either.  Artillery used to defend fortifications continued throughout the period - but we don't represent that in the army lists.  With the collapse of the economy at the end of the Western Roman Empire artillery disappears entirely for several centuries. 

Richard



Glactophagos

  • Legionary
  • *
  • Posts: 114
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2022, 04:27:39 PM »
So it's only redeeming factor would be the range then, really? Hmm...  :-\

Is it even worth it, I wonder?
Let's fight on the table, not on the forum.

badhabum

  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 2144
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2022, 04:35:12 PM »
So it's only redeeming factor would be the range then, really? Hmm...  :-\

Is it even worth it, I wonder?

You could try

At least it could shoot from far away and be behind shield cover or may it not use shield cover if shooting from second rank ?

LawrenceG

  • Centurion
  • *
  • Posts: 435
    • View Profile
    • Travel Terrain shop
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2022, 05:24:10 PM »
Page 158, F.1 allows a file to shoot only once.  You can shoot either the darts or the bolt shooter but not both.

Other points to note:  The base itself cannot have both darts and light artillery.   The bolt shooter could be in a third rank and shoot over the two ranks in front of it. 

Richard

Quote
with any move the TuG may abandon the bolt shooters, in which case replace the artillery base with a
normal legionary base and revert to infantry speeds for movement thereafter. A UG with artillery is missile-focused and will require a card to charge, but can abandon the artillery and
charge at infantry speeds.

When it has been replaced with a "normal legionary base" does it have darts then (if the rest of the TUG does)? Also does the unit remain missile focused?

Might be worth clarifying in the 2023 edition.

nikgaukroger

  • TWZ Team
  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 3993
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2022, 06:19:50 PM »
The unit will be missile focused as long as any bases have non-Charge Only missile capability (see the definition) - so if the unit has Darts it will be, if IW then not.
"The Roman Empire was not murdered and nor did it die a natural death; it accidentally committed suicide."

badhabum

  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 2144
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2022, 10:16:42 AM »
If the boltshooter is in the second rank and the TUG does not shoot with darts ( even if it has them ) , the boltshooter may shoot overhead AND the TUG benefit from shield cover is that right

nikgaukroger

  • TWZ Team
  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 3993
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2022, 11:03:59 AM »
No.

Per the definition of Shield Cover:

Files choose whether to use shield cover or not when shot at - so that applies to the whole file.

Bases that have used Shield Cover cannot shoot.

As the legionary base with Light Artillery capability has Shield Cover if the file it is in uses Shield Cover then it cannot shoot.
"The Roman Empire was not murdered and nor did it die a natural death; it accidentally committed suicide."

lionheartrjc

  • TWZ Team
  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 2332
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2022, 11:36:34 AM »
No.

Per the definition of Shield Cover:

Files choose whether to use shield cover or not when shot at - so that applies to the whole file.

Bases that have used Shield Cover cannot shoot.

As the legionary base with Light Artillery capability has Shield Cover if the file it is in uses Shield Cover then it cannot shoot.

FOR INFORMATION:
THIS RULE IS UNDER REVIEW FOR THE PDF EDITION.  Simon's intention was that it should be a base that chooses whether to use Shield Cover or not and so it wouldn't apply to the whole file.  The PDF edition words the rule this way, so that you could use Shield Cover in the front rank and shoot with the rear rank.  In this situation the Bolt Shooter would be able to shoot. 

It is perhaps worth adding that there is NO intention to introduce widespread rule changes with the PDF edition.  There are however one or two situations, and this is one, where the rules might be tweaked.  The intention is that the old rulebook won't be invalidated.  I'll add an update about the PDF edition in the player discussion forum.

Richard
« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 11:40:30 AM by lionheartrjc »

daveparish

  • Legionary
  • *
  • Posts: 222
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2022, 12:15:36 PM »
No.

Per the definition of Shield Cover:

Files choose whether to use shield cover or not when shot at - so that applies to the whole file.

Bases that have used Shield Cover cannot shoot.

As the legionary base with Light Artillery capability has Shield Cover if the file it is in uses Shield Cover then it cannot shoot.

Oh, I've used exactly that ploy in competition and nobody said anything. I had three deep Dart and Shield cover and said the front rank was shield cover and the back two ranks are shooting. It was with the Syrian Byzantines I think, so hardly likely to bother the podium - but still my opponents were happy with me doing it. Ooops!!

lionheartrjc

  • TWZ Team
  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 2332
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2022, 12:42:16 PM »
Dave,

I think there has been a lot of confusion over this rule, because the intention and what the rule actually said didn't match.  It shows how one word can change the way the rule is played.  It is why writing rules is difficult.

Richard

daveparish

  • Legionary
  • *
  • Posts: 222
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2022, 12:51:51 PM »
Dave,

I think there has been a lot of confusion over this rule, because the intention and what the rule actually said didn't match.  It shows how one word can change the way the rule is played.  It is why writing rules is difficult.

Richard

Oh yes, I really do believe writing rules is difficult - which is why I'm grateful to those who do!  Really looking forward to the PDF version ( ...and I heard you say on the podcast that a main priority is to avoid introducing new errors or problems through an innocent looking word change ... and I also believe that is a realistic worry!)

nikgaukroger

  • TWZ Team
  • Imperator
  • *
  • Posts: 3993
    • View Profile
Re: Yet another bolt shooter question
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2022, 01:10:21 PM »
No.

Per the definition of Shield Cover:

Files choose whether to use shield cover or not when shot at - so that applies to the whole file.

Bases that have used Shield Cover cannot shoot.

As the legionary base with Light Artillery capability has Shield Cover if the file it is in uses Shield Cover then it cannot shoot.

FOR INFORMATION:
THIS RULE IS UNDER REVIEW FOR THE PDF EDITION.  Simon's intention was that it should be a base that chooses whether to use Shield Cover or not and so it wouldn't apply to the whole file.  The PDF edition words the rule this way, so that you could use Shield Cover in the front rank and shoot with the rear rank.  In this situation the Bolt Shooter would be able to shoot. 

It is perhaps worth adding that there is NO intention to introduce widespread rule changes with the PDF edition.  There are however one or two situations, and this is one, where the rules might be tweaked.  The intention is that the old rulebook won't be invalidated.  I'll add an update about the PDF edition in the player discussion forum.

Richard

Thanks for that - when I posted couldn't recall what the position was re: the PDF so thought it best not to say anything just in case.

Can be changed to say "Bases" choose whether to use Shield Cover which I think will do the trick.
"The Roman Empire was not murdered and nor did it die a natural death; it accidentally committed suicide."