mounted FARM infantry

[badhabum]

When a Fully armoured foot tug is mounted I do suppose the horse is not armoured as well ? ( which seems logical )

PG 185 is not very specific ont it, neither pg 210

[Francis Small]

IIRC, the unit is always treated as infantry, not mounted, so the question of armor (sorry, armour) is moot.

[tarnowski1]

IIRC, the unit is always treated as infantry, not mounted, so the question of armor (sorry, armour) is moot.

not quite moot, it would make a difference to their move speeds and travel distance through terrain.

[lionheartrjc]

Infantry with the dismountable characteristic is still infantry.  You are shooting at infantry.

Richard

[badhabum]

Infantry with the dismountable characteristic is still infantry.  You are shooting at infantry.

Richard

So you shoot at armoured "men" who move as loose order ( PG 211 )

It seems strange and not very logic or intuitive  to have mounted infantry being better armoured than mounted knights who have unarmoured horses when shot at but may dismount fully armoured . This might need a comment in the next addenda so as to avoid any mistakes.

[nikgaukroger]

It is already there, and has been for a couple of versions 

[badhabum]

I had not spotted it ( for some reasons ) or completely forgot about it ..still memory problems