Author Topic: knights average (Read 1555 times)

cathare65 · « **on:** January 15, 2019, 10:08:46 PM »

good evening everyone.

Why do the feudal lists have so many knights average then that at this time, it is precisely the knights who dominate the battlefields of Europe and the Middle East?

nikgaukroger · « **Reply #1 on:** January 15, 2019, 10:49:54 PM »

Because Average knights who are Charging Lancer, Devastating Charger, Melee Expert are pretty formidable. Having more as Superior would over egg them.

mad lemmey · « **Reply #2 on:** January 15, 2019, 11:47:22 PM »

And cost a fortune, so you wouldn't have the numbers needed!

cathare65 · « **Reply #3 on:** January 16, 2019, 07:58:32 AM »

"le prix s'oublie, la qualité reste ". French proverb

The problem is that few knights are charging throws and devasting.
When he is an expert, he is often an option.

Moreover after 1150, the majority of the knights pass average while they were sup the year before.

Moreover, as French, I have a little trouble to consider my lords like vulgar horsemen ...

AntiokosIII · « **Reply #4 on:** January 16, 2019, 05:07:11 PM »

Personally, I like the fact that being French, Polish, or Serbian does not automatically make you Superior, as it often did in past rules sets. OK, many French knights are and should be Superior, but not all.

Robin · « **Reply #5 on:** February 08, 2019, 08:32:42 AM »

Superior

surely you mean impetuous

Author Topic: knights average (Read 1555 times)

cathare65

knights average

nikgaukroger

Re: knights average

mad lemmey

Re: knights average

cathare65

Re: knights average

AntiokosIII

Re: knights average

Robin

Re: knights average