Mounted Polearm and evade

Started by badhabum, November 04, 2023, 11:26:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

badhabum

It's more out of curiosity :

Mounted PA cost 28 points
CL cost 25 points

CL may not evade
PA may evade and be used in melee

Both may inflict "Shatter" , both need open terrain

My real question is why may mounted PA evade while CL ( and DC ) who also may shatter so is a very agressive weapon (and characteristic ) may not ?

To mee it's a huge advantage for the mounted PA who I admit is not good vs infantry ( impact )

nikgaukroger

#1
The claims are materially different in the charge and CL are much better here.

CL +2 in the charge against anything unless the usual exceptions.

Mtd PA no claims against infantry, +1 against mounted other than CL and LSp.

Mtd PA then get +1 in melee so they are better there.

Evade (if they have a suitable missile capability of course) because it seems to fit the way the troops operated. Although it is fair to say that Mtd PA is a bit of an oddity in a few ways and you could probably drop it from the rules to no ill effect and use other classifications to do pretty much the same thing.
"The Roman Empire was not murdered and nor did it die a natural death; it accidentally committed suicide."