Double Wheel - compendium pg102

[stuuk]

The image shows the Romans doing a double wheel without a 1BW gap between the wheels.
Presume this is in error and the QRS is correct that there should be a gap between them?

[nikgaukroger]

Inded.

That one slipped through - annoying as we did a diagram specific proof-read  Ah, well guess there had to be one ...

[stuuk]

Yup, without a cast of hundreds of readers you'll never catch everything.

Skimming the book just now - looks great, and some of the re-writes and really helpful - forces/free charges I noted in particular is much easier to read.

[nikgaukroger]

Skimming the book just now - looks great, and some of the re-writes and really helpful - forces/free charges I noted in particular is much easier to read.

It is    Was one I always managed to confuse myself with but the new wording is good 

[Simon Meg-Meister]

A prize for the first mistake spotted.   

Impossible to spot everything even with 7 proof readers.
I didn't even register to change it after that was inserted very early on.
Hurrah our first errata.  What page is it on please (as I don't have a copy)?

Si

[nikgaukroger]

Page 102.

[Simon Meg-Meister]

Tx amend added

[stuuk]

Hey Simon, thank you for my prize!
But.. I'll settle for that refund (for the code) if you wouldn't mind checking on progress for me

Thanks!
Stu.

[Simon Meg-Meister]

Can you PM me details on messenger or WA. As you can imagine so many comms at the moment its easy to let things slip through. Have requested update from PSC this am. Am speaking to Mark about Lurkio shortly and will report back.

Si