Hey, just thought I'd point out that in the Pacto version of the Imperial Romans list veteran Legionaries are graded as average, when they are superior in the Maximus version, I'm assuming this is a mistake.

As the subject says, do infantry with the dismountable trait count as cavalry or infantry for the purposes of how many red cards you need for a flank march?

So first off, I know close to nothing about the military history of Burma, so please excuse my ignorance if this question has an obvious answer! In the Kingdom of Pagan list it has a unit called "Replace militia spearmen" Which over regular militia spearmen are protected, lose short spear, and gain devastating charger. I didn't see anything in the troop notes about these guys, what do they represent?

This isn't really so much a rules query as a historical clarification. According to the list Cyrenean Greeks can use chariot units until 275BCE. However it appears that the ability to take dismountable hoplites on chariots is not limited to 275BCE. Did they continue to use chariots for transportation past 275BCE?

Has anyone tried the Checkerboard formation with Republican Romans in Meg? It seems you would lose a lot of TUGs having your worst troops up front. Also how do you manage block moves? Do you just have the corners touching?

I'm curious about how Devastating charger is costed, because it seems like a weaker rule for mounted units than infantry, (max of +1 bonus for mounted, pikes and long spears are much more common than charging lancers) but it seems, percentage wise, to cost the same mounted and unmounted(mounted pays more in hard numbers). For example, formed loose average protected infantry cost 60 without, 70 with, a 16% increase, and formed loose average protected cavalry cost 80 without, 93 with, also 16%. It seems like the cavalry pays too much for a worse ability?

So on page 126 under RUN AWAY AND SKIRMISH RESPONSES

"1.3. Other cavalry, camelry or chariot are TuGs that are missile focused (i.e. have a missile weapon and skilled, unskilled) may choose to run away or skirmish or choose to stand and recieve (and may choose to shoot at chargers if they stand)."

My question is, is it supposed to say "...Other cavalry, camelry or chariot TuGs that are missile focused..."

Or

is it supposed to say "...Other cavalry, camelry or chariot or TuGs that are missile focused..."?

So for Ambushes, my impression is you place the ambush card in vision blocking terrain and place a note under it stating what it contains, if anything. My question is, isn't my opponent going to know what the Ambushes contain by what I haven't placed on the table? Or is the assumption that they haven't seen my army list?