Hi All,
What is everyone`s view on the following
When you use an external ally with compulsory Royal Guards or equivalent, I think these should be an option rather than compulsory for an external ally force.
but why can the ally not by the king with his best troops?
He's saying why do they have to be I think, not that they cannot be.
ahh, OK, misread
the size of the problem
as far as i can tell, there are 5 armies with a troop type containing the word 'royal' with a non 0 minimum
Syro-Canaanite
Urartian
Khazar
Anuradhapura Kingdom
Richard III English
only 3 of those turn up as allies
Syro-Canaanite
Urartian
Anuradhapura Kingdom
in a total of 5 main lists
Hittite Empire
Mitanni
Mannaian
Phrygian
Tamil Indian
so this is only an issue if you take 1 of those 5 main lists, and then choose to take the ally with royal troops
so probably not worth making a rule for
..or if its guard that is the issue
there are 4 armies with non 0 minimums of troops with the word guard in the description
Achaemenid Persian - Royal Army
Andalusian
T'ang China - Nanyajun
Early Tudor English