Text only | Text with Images

MeG

Author's Section => Rules Queries and Clarifications => Topic started by: PUNCH on April 17, 2019, 12:17:24 PM

Title: break off with general in front combat
Post by: PUNCH on April 17, 2019, 12:17:24 PM
a situation we had last Week:

a norman general fighting in combat with his TUG of Knights against a TUG of éléphants wanted to break off , so plays a card to do F3 on the manœuvre table.

must having a KAB for his " formed" mounted.


this snivelling little coward  :) did not want to have a KAB because he leaves the combat pretending that a Breaking off is not leaving a combat ( booohhh!).

but he must have a KAB !! the rules chapter 9.8 B 2.2.3.5 page 97 "if an opposing general plays a card to leave combat then you get a KAB test on the UG (whether staying with the UG or not)."

Am I right Simon?

All the best.

PUNCH " the elephant :) :)"
Title: Re: break off with general in front combat
Post by: nikgaukroger on April 17, 2019, 12:41:43 PM
Already answered - https://mortem-et-gloriam.co.uk/smf/index.php?topic=336.0
Title: Re: break off with general in front combat
Post by: Rino on April 17, 2019, 04:34:27 PM
Eheh too late!!

And you can't brand knight charging éléphants as being coward!!

Rino - the Knight
Title: Re: break off with general in front combat
Post by: Simon Meg-Meister on April 20, 2019, 10:40:41 AM
Played a card to "break off" not to "leave the combat [still onoing]"
Text only | Text with Images