Wondering what the brains trust think of this. Knocked up quickly as a potential for doing a Chinese army.
(https://i.imgur.com/AUxJQL6.jpg)
not bad, a nice offensive cavalry wing...missing shoot and charge to be fully effective, but not bad
Has a bit of a feel of my Nike byzantine desing from ITC.
Think its very nice.
Solid infantry blocking force.
Powerful cataphracts supported by other good cavalry.
My only comment is it feel C&C heavy.
Talented only useful if FM or commanding a big block of 4 which doesn't seem that likely.
Can you get a bit more troops from a bit less C&C?
I like it. Good army.
Si
Quote from: Simon Meg-Meister on January 28, 2019, 04:30:36 PM
My only comment is it feel C&C heavy.
Talented only useful if FM or commanding a big block of 4 which doesn't seem that likely.
Can you get a bit more troops from a bit less C&C?
Had wondered about that - I tend to design with maybe more command than I may need and then downsize rather than the other way.
Needs one more solid infantry TuG IMHO.
I think you are probably correct there.
What would you lose to free the points to do it?
There are 204 from the rubbish archer TUG, but then?
Do you need 4 Generals for 9 TuGs?
Are the squirmishers compulsory?
Skirmishers aren't compulsory.
Think I'd like 4 generals, but 2 comp and 2 med may be OK.
Which could give this:
(https://i.imgur.com/d5RKqYf.jpg)
Solid. IMHO
Certainly a basis for working out what lead I need ;D
Yes I prefer that.
Stronger infantry centre to work around and you can spare 1 TuG to help cavalry if you need to.
10 discs good enough.
Like it.
Si